We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I believe allowing constructors with arguments to be default would save us a lot of typing and dead-weight code space.
class FieldModel { FieldModel(Map data) { ... } } class SealerModel extends FieldModel { // SealerModel(Map data) : super(data); }
Instead of the compile error I'd like that constructor to be picked up and used as default for the subclass.
error: The superclass 'FieldModel' doesn't have a zero argument constructor. (no_default_super_constructor_implicit at ...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
I believe allowing constructors with arguments to be default would save us a lot of typing and dead-weight code space.
Instead of the compile error I'd like that constructor to be picked up and used as default for the subclass.
error: The superclass 'FieldModel' doesn't have a zero argument constructor. (no_default_super_constructor_implicit at ...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: