Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The getValuePtr function should support primitive types #13

Open
mdpiper opened this issue Dec 20, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

The getValuePtr function should support primitive types #13

mdpiper opened this issue Dec 20, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@mdpiper
Copy link
Member

mdpiper commented Dec 20, 2021

Currently getValuePtr is written as a generic class. This contradicts the recommendation that only primitive types should be supported for values in the Java BMI--see, e.g., here. The getValuePtr function should be specified through multiple constructors to primitive types, like getValue.

@mdpiper mdpiper changed the title The getValuePtr function shouldn't use a wrapper class The getValuePtr function should support primitive types Dec 20, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant