-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
trackGenJetAK4 added #46627
trackGenJetAK4 added #46627
Conversation
cms-bot internal usage |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-46627/42531 |
A new Pull Request was created by @pasenov for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @ftorrresd, @hqucms can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
enable nano |
please test |
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
The changes add ~2% to MC NANOs. Is this |
Yes, it is essential for our analysis to have trackGenJetAK4Table also in the standard NANO |
Hi @hqucms , this is the corresponding MC information to what is in SoftActivity related variables that are already there. We can probably apply (much) more aggressive compresion and/or ,as we do in reco variables, only store the first N genjets plus some counters over threshold. |
Hi @arizzi -- indeed those would be good to try to keep the size under control. |
The main usage is now for FlashSim, but in fact it is "a bug" not to have some corresponding MC information to a given reco variables (we added for the same reasons years ago a few Gen level fat/sub jets collections that I do not think are really used in any analysis) |
@hqucms Patrick is updating the PR setting the precision to similar precision as for RECO for these jets. Adding the limit at 6 (and adding the counters) is probably not making a large difference at GEN level because the number of jets seems to be in average below 6. Can you run the size checks again after the coming PR update from @pasenov ? |
Pull request #46627 was updated. @cmsbuild, @ftorrresd, @hqucms can you please check and sign again. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-46627/43206
|
Pull request #46627 was updated. @cmsbuild, @ftorrresd, @hqucms can you please check and sign again. |
Hi @ftorrresd , Thank you for the suggestion. I added TrackGenJetAK4 to the nanoDQM as well. Best, |
please abort |
please test |
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @mandrenguyen, @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
I have added trackGenJetAK4 to jetMC_cff.py. It is used to produce a list of genJets that are made with charged particles only (fulfilling some criteria). The only changes made are in PhysicsTools/NanoAOD/python/nanogen_cff.py and PhysicsTools/NanoAOD/python/jetMC_cff.py.