-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add gct unpacker back into stage-1 unpacking sequence #13310
Add gct unpacker back into stage-1 unpacking sequence #13310
Conversation
please test |
+1 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar |
A new Pull Request was created by @mulhearn for CMSSW_8_0_X. It involves the following packages: L1Trigger/Configuration @cmsbuild, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are list here #13028 |
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ def unpack_legacy(): | |||
|
|||
|
|||
def unpack_stage1(): | |||
global csctfDigis, dttfDigis, gtDigis,caloStage1Digis,caloStage1FinalDigis | |||
global csctfDigis, dttfDigis, gtDigis,caloStage1Digis,caloStage1FinalDigis,gctDigis |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mulhearn - I had missed these globals.. we'll need to remove them at some point very soon. why are they needed here?
The globals are just so that this can be organized as modules? Why is this any different then (not in a subroutine):
which we do all the time? |
Maybe I don't understand global variables in python. I can fix this quickly if you want, I'll just have to move all the import statements out of the subroutines. Or this can wait until a planned future update: I want to move this to a mode where every unpacker always runs, but maybe only the "required for the era" unpackers are allowed to complain (once) if their payloads are empty. |
ah - its not what I thought at first - is ok - though indeed we'll need to rearrange this somewhat eventually. |
+1 |
Add gct unpacker back into stage-1 unpacking sequence
This PR adds gct unpacking back into Stage-1 unpacking sequence, as expected by the offline DQM.
This should quiet HLT GRUN validation errors from recent IB @Martin-Grunewald