Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bsunanda:Run2-hcx64 Introduce changes needed for Hcal geometry for 2016 and 2017 #13139

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Feb 11, 2016

Conversation

bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

This takes care of additional channels for HF, additional trigger primitives for HF and new layout of HE for phase I

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for CMSSW_8_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

Geometry/CaloTopology
Geometry/HcalCommonData
Geometry/HcalTowerAlgo

@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/10863/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: 2b64bca
I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test runtestSimCalorimetryHGCalSimProducers had ERRORS
---> test testRecoMETMETProducers had ERRORS

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13139/10863/summary.html

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #13139 was updated. @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/10868/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2016

-1

Tested at: 27108bd
I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test runtestSimCalorimetryHGCalSimProducers had ERRORS
---> test testRecoMETMETProducers had ERRORS

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13139/10868/summary.html

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2016

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsunanda commented Feb 1, 2016

I checked both these unit tests:
cmsRun $CMSSW_RELEASE_BASE/src/SimCalorimetry/HGCalSimProducers/test/testHGCalDigi_cfg.py
cmsRun $CMSSW_RELEASE_BASE/src/RecoMET/METProducers/test/recoMET_pfClusterMet_cfg.py
without and with these PR's with the current IB. The tests failed in both the scenario with similar error message. So I don't think the failure is due to this PR.

@ianna
Copy link
Contributor

ianna commented Feb 8, 2016

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 8, 2016

@ianna
Copy link
Contributor

ianna commented Feb 8, 2016

@bsunanda - I assume we'll need a new set of GTs with updated records for Hcal parameters.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Feb 8, 2016

+1
changes in CalibCalorimetry/HcalAlgos and CalibCalorimetry/HcalPlugins are OK.
Caveats:

  • please let us know when new conditions for updating the Global Tag are available
  • as far as we can understand proposed changes in the geometry remain un-probed in the PR tests as geometry is accessed via DB.

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsunanda commented Feb 8, 2016

@ianna It is worthwhile to have one for 2016 scenario. I made the cfi file using Run I pixel and the new HCAL which will be for 2016 operation

@ianna
Copy link
Contributor

ianna commented Feb 9, 2016

@mmusich - Could you, please, create a 2016 GT queue starting from 2015 one.
BTW, there is still a problem with DropBox HcalParameters schema. All 2017 but this tag have been uploaded.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Feb 9, 2016

@ianna please use the conditionsUpload service instead of the Dropbox. I sent you a private message about it.

@ianna
Copy link
Contributor

ianna commented Feb 9, 2016

@mmusich - thanks! I've send a request for 2017 GT update. Please, let me know when 2016 queue is there.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Feb 9, 2016

@ianna, thanks we are integrating those in the 80X_upgrade2017_design_Queue.
for what concerns the 2016 there is no dedicated 2016 upgrade queue, since this involves the simulation of this year data-taking, therefore should go on the standard queues.

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

except we need also a 2015 geometry (for 2015 data) - some naming discussion is needed to get all of this right as we learn more about the requirements..

On Feb 9, 2016, at 4:06 PM, Marco Musich notifications@github.com wrote:

@ianna, thanks we are integrating those in the 80X_upgrade2017_design_Queue.
for what concerns the 2016 there is no dedicated 2016 upgrade queue, since this involves the simulation of this year data-taking, therefore should go on the standard queues.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@ianna
Copy link
Contributor

ianna commented Feb 9, 2016

@mmusich - I'm afraid, there are changes in Hcal parameters tag which is without label... We do need a new GT for that.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Feb 9, 2016

@ianna, you mean a new queue.

@ianna
Copy link
Contributor

ianna commented Feb 9, 2016

@mmusich - yes, please.

@bsunanda - BTW, are 2016 and 2017 scenarios the two Frank was talking about (with different depth segmentation)? or we'll need one more variation?

@kpedro88 kpedro88 mentioned this pull request Feb 9, 2016
@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsunanda commented Feb 9, 2016

@davidlange6 Could you please integrate this. I would like to submit a PR based on that IB and want that to be a part of 8_0_0

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

@davidlange6 It is really quite important for this one to be merged...

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@davidlange6 Do you know when I can get the IB with this PR integrated?


From: Ianna Osborne [notifications@github.com]
Sent: 09 February 2016 16:15
To: cms-sw/cmssw
Cc: Sunanda Banerjee
Subject: Re: [cmssw] bsunanda:Run2-hcx64 Introduce changes needed for Hcal geometry for 2016 and 2017 (#13139)

@mmusichhttps://github.com/mmusich - yes, please.

@bsunandahttps://github.com/bsunanda - BTW, are 2016 and 2017 scenarios the two Frank was talking about (with different depth segmentation)? or we'll need one more variation?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/13139#issuecomment-181910256.

davidlange6 added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2016
bsunanda:Run2-hcx64 Introduce changes needed for Hcal geometry for 2016 and 2017
@davidlange6 davidlange6 merged commit e183653 into cms-sw:CMSSW_8_0_X Feb 11, 2016
@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

sorry for the wait, was getting a working IB...

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks David. Already submitted the next one


From: David Lange [notifications@github.com]
Sent: 11 February 2016 07:54
To: cms-sw/cmssw
Cc: Sunanda Banerjee
Subject: Re: [cmssw] bsunanda:Run2-hcx64 Introduce changes needed for Hcal geometry for 2016 and 2017 (#13139)

sorry for the wait, was getting a working IB...


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/13139#issuecomment-182739617.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants