Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix Bu_D0Pi_KPiPi.dec #13134

Merged

Conversation

taweiXcms
Copy link
Contributor

change line 12 from
1.000 anti-D0 pi+ PHSP;
to
1.000 Myanti-D0 pi+ PHSP;

@mandrenguyen, @yenjie, @ginnocen

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @taweiXcms (tawei) for CMSSW_7_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

GeneratorInterface/ExternalDecays

@vciulli, @covarell, @thuer, @cmsbuild, @bendavid, @davidlange6, @govoni can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@inugent, @mkirsano this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

@covarell
Copy link
Contributor

sorry, what is this fix for? The samples have already been produced... @vmariani

@taweiXcms
Copy link
Contributor Author

Dear contacts,

This PR is just a small fix on the EvtGen file of B to D0p.
Same fix had been PRed to 8XX and signed by many.
Since the next 71X will be out very soon.
Would you please have a quick look at this PR and proceed if possible.
We sincerely appreciate your help on this matter.

Regards
Ta-Wei

@taweiXcms
Copy link
Contributor Author

Heavy-Ion group is also planning to produce this sample in PbPb collision.
The previous EvtGen file does not require the D0 from B to decay to Kpi which its likely to be a typo.
And this will result in a low filter efficiency if we are trying to filter on this decay.
The already produced sample is totally fine since it just required more events to be generated at the beginning.
We just like this to be fixed if possible so that we don't have to generated many events for PbPb collision sample as well.

@covarell
Copy link
Contributor

covarell commented Feb 1, 2016

OK, but please make a PR for 75X if you want to use the same in HI

@covarell
Copy link
Contributor

covarell commented Feb 1, 2016

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/10901/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2016

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_1_X IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@taweiXcms
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you very much.
This fix is already in 758patch3.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2016

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2016

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2016
@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 1384a9a into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_1_X Feb 1, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants