Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

switching to puppi candidate based tagging for puppi jets #18426

Closed
slava77 opened this issue Apr 20, 2017 · 7 comments
Closed

switching to puppi candidate based tagging for puppi jets #18426

slava77 opened this issue Apr 20, 2017 · 7 comments

Comments

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Apr 20, 2017

related to the discussion in #18317

a check should be done with latest higher PU samples to check the btag performance on puppi jets using current default pfCands vs puppiCands.
If the gain is positive as it's already clearly seen in phase-2, the change should be applied to all eras instead of just phase-2

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor Author

slava77 commented Apr 20, 2017

assign reconstruction

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

New categories assigned: reconstruction

@slava77,@perrotta you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 20, 2017

A new Issue was created by @slava77 Slava Krutelyov.

@davidlange6, @Dr15Jones, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign/assign? Thanks.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor Author

slava77 commented Apr 20, 2017

@ferencek @imarches

@ferencek
Copy link
Contributor

After some discussion within the BTV POG, we decided to switch the b tagging input for Puppi jets from PF candidates to Puppi candidates for all eras. Given the fact that ak4 Puppi jets are not yet the default jet collection, we can run a non-default b tagging setup on these jets and monitor it more easily.

This change is implemented in #18666 (92X) and #18667 (91X).

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor Author

slava77 commented Jun 28, 2017

+1

fixed in #18666

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is fully signed and ready to be closed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants