You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The same is probably true of other commands. If I invoke ar, start typing a namespace name, and then change my mind, C-g doesn't behave as expected.
I would expect it to either (1) go back to what I had before the command started or (2) abort the command and leave the ns form as it is now.
Instead, when I hit C-g, it leaves the ns form as it is now and then continues with the command (which means that it cleans up and evaluates the ns form). Evaluating the ns form is particularly problematic because I'm guaranteed to have an unfinished namespace name in there.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@bbatsov I don't think we need the stalebot in this project or for refactor-nrepl.
I don't see any value in closing issues just because they're old. They're still relevant and if someone wants to help out they now have a list of issues to take on.
@MalloZup Wait, you just took it upon yourself to update every issue with a staleness report? If none of the other maintainers asked you to do this, could you please have the bot clean up after itself (in the refactor-nrepl repo too, please) and delete all the comments it made? Thanks!
The same is probably true of other commands. If I invoke
ar
, start typing a namespace name, and then change my mind,C-g
doesn't behave as expected.I would expect it to either (1) go back to what I had before the command started or (2) abort the command and leave the ns form as it is now.
Instead, when I hit
C-g
, it leaves thens
form as it is now and then continues with the command (which means that it cleans up and evaluates the ns form). Evaluating the ns form is particularly problematic because I'm guaranteed to have an unfinished namespace name in there.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: