Release locateip 0.1.3

[judith-bourque]

According to CRAN policies, "Submitting updates should be done responsibly and with respect for the volunteers’ time. Once a package is established (which may take several rounds), “no more than every 1–2 months” seems appropriate."

As this package was published on 2023-06-06, should wait until the end of July, beginning of August.

To do

Prepare for release:

• git pull
• Check current CRAN check results
• Polish NEWS
• devtools::build_readme()
• urlchecker::url_check()
• devtools::check(remote = TRUE, manual = TRUE)
• devtools::check_win_devel()
• rhub::check_for_cran()
• revdepcheck::revdep_check(num_workers = 4)
• Update cran-comments.md
• git push

Submit to CRAN:

• usethis::use_version('patch')
• devtools::submit_cran()
• Approve email

Wait for CRAN...

• Accepted 🎉
• git push
• usethis::use_github_release()
• usethis::use_dev_version()
• git push

[judith-bourque]

Waiting for e-mail results from devtools::check_win_devel()

[judith-bourque]

Same Notes as #55. Can ignore them.

N  checking for non-standard things in the check directory
   Found the following files/directories:
     ''NULL''
N  checking for detritus in the temp directory
   Found the following files/directories:
     'lastMiKTeXException'
```

[judith-bourque]

• Download devtools::install_github('r-lib/revdepcheck')
• usethis::use_revdep()

[judith-bourque]

devtools::check_win_devel() results

Dear package maintainer,

this notification has been generated automatically.
Your package locateip_0.1.3.tar.gz has been built (if working) and checked for Windows.
Please check the log files and (if working) the binary package at:
https://win-builder.r-project.org/H0c5FGN1HMVy
The files will be removed after roughly 72 hours.
Installation time in seconds: 3
Check time in seconds: 50
Status: 1 NOTE
R Under development (unstable) (2023-06-06 r84511 ucrt)

All the best,
Uwe Ligges
(CRAN maintainer of binary packages for Windows)

Solution

The winbuilder note for R under developement probably won't be an issue. After looking it up, seems like a standard note regarding the context of the tests.