Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Error: no supported interface #2362

Closed
parv3213 opened this issue Aug 8, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Error: no supported interface #2362

parv3213 opened this issue Aug 8, 2022 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@parv3213
Copy link

parv3213 commented Aug 8, 2022

Description

Get the following error while trying to run go-ipfs-daemon-

2022/08/08 09:20:55 [zeroconf] no suitable IPv4 interface: udp4: failed to join any of these interfaces: [{10 1500 eth0 02:42:ac:11:00:02 up|broadcast|multicast}]
2022/08/08 09:20:55 [zeroconf] no suitable IPv6 interface: udp6: failed to join any of these interfaces: [{10 1500 eth0 02:42:ac:11:00:02 up|broadcast|multicast}]
2022-08-08T09:20:55.218Z	ERROR	cmd/ipfs	ipfs/daemon.go:430	error from node construction: no supported interface

Technical Information

Steps to reproduce-

➜  ~ docker run\
  -p 5001:5001 \
  -p 8011:8011 \
  ceramicnetwork/go-ipfs-daemon \

WARNING: The requested image's platform (linux/amd64) does not match the detected host platform (linux/arm64/v8) and no specific platform was requested
Changing user to ipfs
ipfs version 0.12.0
generating 2048-bit RSA keypair...done
peer identity: QmRJ3ts16isXCp8ayUGRVSizh64bw27K5WVvdqg7JpKW91
initializing IPFS node at /data/ipfs
to get started, enter:

	ipfs cat /ipfs/QmQPeNsJPyVWPFDVHb77w8G42Fvo15z4bG2X8D2GhfbSXc/readme

sh: true: unknown operand
Initializing daemon...
go-ipfs version: 0.12.0-06191df-dirty
Repo version: 12
System version: amd64/linux
Golang version: go1.16.7
2022/08/08 09:20:55 [zeroconf] no suitable IPv4 interface: udp4: failed to join any of these interfaces: [{10 1500 eth0 02:42:ac:11:00:02 up|broadcast|multicast}]
2022/08/08 09:20:55 [zeroconf] no suitable IPv6 interface: udp6: failed to join any of these interfaces: [{10 1500 eth0 02:42:ac:11:00:02 up|broadcast|multicast}]
2022-08-08T09:20:55.218Z	ERROR	cmd/ipfs	ipfs/daemon.go:430	error from node construction: no supported interface

Error: no supported interface
➜  ~ docker run --platform linux/amd64 \
  -p 5001:5001 \
  -p 8011:8011 \
  ceramicnetwork/go-ipfs-daemon \

Changing user to ipfs
ipfs version 0.12.0
generating 2048-bit RSA keypair...done
peer identity: QmUcJWMiKNx7hadx5WYZXdyny5rJieMyDy6hwUDuVaNj68
initializing IPFS node at /data/ipfs
to get started, enter:

	ipfs cat /ipfs/QmQPeNsJPyVWPFDVHb77w8G42Fvo15z4bG2X8D2GhfbSXc/readme

sh: true: unknown operand
Initializing daemon...
go-ipfs version: 0.12.0-06191df-dirty
Repo version: 12
System version: amd64/linux
Golang version: go1.16.7
2022/08/08 09:21:04 [zeroconf] no suitable IPv4 interface: udp4: failed to join any of these interfaces: [{12 1500 eth0 02:42:ac:11:00:02 up|broadcast|multicast}]
2022/08/08 09:21:04 [zeroconf] no suitable IPv6 interface: udp6: failed to join any of these interfaces: [{12 1500 eth0 02:42:ac:11:00:02 up|broadcast|multicast}]
2022-08-08T09:21:04.101Z	ERROR	cmd/ipfs	ipfs/daemon.go:430	error from node construction: no supported interface

Error: no supported interface
@pradel
Copy link
Contributor

pradel commented Aug 8, 2022

Facing the same issue on my mac m1, it seems related to this issue ipfs/kubo#8645 and fixed in one of the latest kubo releases. I guess the version used in https://github.com/ceramicnetwork/go-ipfs-daemon needs to be updated.

@stbrody
Copy link
Contributor

stbrody commented Aug 17, 2022

Thanks for the report. We are working on upgrading our ceramicnetwork/go-ipfs-daemon package to use the latest version of kubo. Will report back when that is complete

@smrz2001 smrz2001 self-assigned this Sep 14, 2022
@smrz2001
Copy link
Contributor

smrz2001 commented Sep 26, 2022

Hi @parv3213, can you please try this again with the latest go-ipfs-daemon image? We've just updated to a newer version of kubo.

Also, thanks @pradel for the input!

@smrz2001
Copy link
Contributor

Closing for now, until more data is available.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants