-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Prefix Definition #73
Comments
for example:
should the double underscore
|
For comparison, the terse triple language (ttl) includes the prefix separator (':') in the prefix definition:
I suspect it was this pattern that we initially adopted. |
The other pattern relevant here for the alternative approach is taken from JSON-LD - see https://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/ Example: |
The current proposal is to provide prefixes in a variable such as "bald_prefixes". In this case the parser knows where to get the prefixes from so not having the double underscore in a prefix declaration is not a problem. Pros might be:
Cons:
The double underscore pattern - pros:
Cons
|
Should a prefix definition include the double underscore character, so that
cat prefix alias
results in a URI?Or
Should the prefix separator be part of the standard, and not be included in the prefix definition
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: