Merge pull request #3392 from tomasandroil/fix/fix

Improve Code Readability by Correcting Minor Text Issues

crates/pallet-domains/src/benchmarking.rs

@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ mod benchmarks {
 
         assert_eq!(
             PendingSlashes::<T>::get(domain_id)
-                .expect("pedning slash must exist")
+                .expect("pending slash must exist")
                 .len(),
             n as usize
         );
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ mod benchmarks {
         if s != 0 {
             assert_eq!(
                 PendingSlashes::<T>::get(domain_id)
-                    .expect("pedning slash must exist")
+                    .expect("pending slash must exist")
                     .len(),
                 s as usize
             );

crates/sp-domains-fraud-proof/src/verification.rs

@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ where
     // - block_fees transaction_byte_fee_extrinsic
     // - domain_sudo extrinsic
     // Since we use `push_front`, the extrinsics should be pushed in reverse order.
-    // TODO: this will not be valid once we have a different runtime. To achive consistency across
+    // TODO: this will not be valid once we have a different runtime. To achieve consistency across
     // domains, we should define a runtime api for each domain, which orders the extrinsics the
     // same way the inherents are derived while the domain block is being built.
 
@@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ where
     )?;
     let bundle_extrinsic_root = targeted_invalid_bundle_entry.extrinsics_root;
 
-    // Verify the bundle proof so in following we can use the bundle dirctly
+    // Verify the bundle proof so in following we can use the bundle directly
     match proof_data {
         InvalidBundlesProofData::Bundle(bundle_with_proof)
         | InvalidBundlesProofData::BundleAndExecution {
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ where
         InvalidBundlesProofData::InvalidXDMProofData { .. } => {}
     }
 
-    // Fast path to check if the fraud proof is targetting a bad receipt that claim a non-exist extrinsic
+    // Fast path to check if the fraud proof is targeting a bad receipt that claim a non-exist extrinsic
     // is invalid
     if let Some(invalid_extrinsic_index) = targeted_invalid_bundle_entry.invalid_extrinsic_index() {
         if let InvalidBundlesProofData::Bundle(bundle_with_proof) = proof_data {

crates/subspace-networking/src/node.rs

@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ impl Node {
         Ok(result_receiver)
     }
 
-    /// Subcribe to some topic on the DSN.
+    /// Subscribe to some topic on the DSN.
     pub async fn subscribe(&self, topic: Sha256Topic) -> Result<TopicSubscription, SubscribeError> {
         let permit = self.shared.rate_limiter.acquire_permit().await;
         let (result_sender, result_receiver) = oneshot::channel();
@@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ impl Node {
         })
     }
 
-    /// Subcribe a messgo to some topic on the DSN.
+    /// Subscribe a messgo to some topic on the DSN.
     pub async fn publish(&self, topic: Sha256Topic, message: Vec<u8>) -> Result<(), PublishError> {
         let _permit = self.shared.rate_limiter.acquire_permit().await;
         let (result_sender, result_receiver) = oneshot::channel();