Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: implemented componentization in client.js #1407

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Adi-204
Copy link
Contributor

@Adi-204 Adi-204 commented Mar 13, 2025

Description
Implemented componentization in packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/template/client.js.

Below is screenshot of test -

image

Related issue(s)
Fixes #1349

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a suite of new components for managing WebSocket interactions, including establishing connections, handling messages, registering custom error and message handlers, and sending echo messages.
    • Added a ClientClass component to encapsulate client functionality.
    • New components: CloseConnection, Connect, Constructor, HandleMessage, ModuleExport, RegisterErrorHandler, RegisterMessageHandler, and SendEchoMessage.
  • Refactor

    • Redesigned the client architecture from a class-based implementation to a modular, component-based approach, enhancing maintainability and clarity.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Mar 13, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 6ee7425

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 13, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces several new React functional components to replace a monolithic WebSocket client class with a modular architecture. Components such as CloseConnection, Connect, Constructor, HandleMessage, RegisterMessageHandler, RegisterErrorHandler, SendEchoMessage, and ModuleExport encapsulate specific functionalities related to WebSocket operations. The main client file has been restructured to utilize these components, improving organization and maintainability.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/CloseConnection.js, Connect.js, Constructor.js, HandleMessage.js, SendEchoMessage.js New React components added to encapsulate functionalities for closing connections, establishing connections, initializing client structure, processing messages, and sending echo messages.
packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/RegisterMessageHandler.js, RegisterErrorHandler.js New components added that encapsulate methods for registering message and error handlers with basic type validation.
packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/ModuleExport.js New component added to output a formatted CommonJS module export for the client name.
packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/template/client.js.js Rewritten client file transitioning from a monolithic class to a modular, component-based architecture leveraging the newly created components.
packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/ClientClass.js New component added to encapsulate the client functionality, integrating the various WebSocket operations.

Suggested labels

ready-to-merge

Suggested reviewers

  • Florence-Njeri
  • asyncapi-bot-eve
  • derberg

Poem

Oh, dear coder, hop along the trail,
I’m a rabbit of code, with components so frail,
Each little module dances in a digital spree,
Bringing new life to our WebSocket jamboree,
With every click and hop, our changes delight,
In the code garden, everything shines so bright!
🐰💻

Tip

⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments. This experimental feature enhances review discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments.
    - To enable this feature, set early_access to true under in the settings.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8262e21 and 6ee7425.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/test/__snapshots__/snapshot.test.js.snap is excluded by !**/*.snap
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/Constructor.js (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: Test generator as dependency with Node 20
  • GitHub Check: Test generator as dependency with Node 18
  • GitHub Check: Test NodeJS PR - windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: Test NodeJS PR - macos-13
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/Constructor.js (1)

1-17: Well-structured component implementation.

The Constructor component is well-designed, using proper React functional component patterns and the Text component with appropriate indentation. The template string is clean and initializes all the necessary properties for a WebSocket client (URL, WebSocket instance, and handler arrays).

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Nitpick comments (8)
packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/Constructor.js (1)

6-14: Consider consistent indentation in template strings

The indentation inside your template string is inconsistent with the JSX structure. Consider either using consistent indentation or using a tool like Prettier to maintain code formatting.

packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/CloseConnection.js (1)

7-13: Consider removing or conditionally logging console messages

The console.log statement on line 11 might not be desired in a production environment. Consider either:

  1. Removing it
  2. Making it conditional based on a debug/development flag
  3. Using a more sophisticated logging mechanism

This would make the client more suitable for production use.

packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/SendEchoMessage.js (1)

1-17: Component structure looks good, but nested Text components seem redundant

The SendEchoMessage component is well-structured, but there's unnecessary nesting of Text components. A single Text component should be sufficient to render the string content.

export function SendEchoMessage () {
  return (
-  <Text>
    <Text>
        {
          `  // Method to send an echo message to the server
  sendEchoMessage(message) {
    this.websocket.send(JSON.stringify(message));
    console.log('Sent message to echo server:', message);
  }`
        }
    </Text>
-  </Text>
  );
}
packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/RegisterErrorHandler.js (1)

1-20: Component structure looks good, but nested Text components are redundant

The RegisterErrorHandler component is well-structured and correctly implements error handler registration. However, the nested Text components are unnecessary.

export function RegisterErrorHandler  () {
  return (
-  <Text>
    <Text>
        {
          `  // Method to register custom error handlers
  registerErrorHandler(handler) {
    if (typeof handler === 'function') {
      this.errorHandlers.push(handler);
    } else {
      console.warn('Error handler must be a function');
    }
  }`
        }
    </Text>
-  </Text>
  );
}
packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/RegisterMessageHandler.js (1)

1-20: Simplify component structure by removing redundant Text wrapper

Similar to the other components, there's unnecessary nesting of Text components that should be simplified.

export function RegisterMessageHandler () {
  return (
-  <Text>
    <Text>
        {
          `  // Method to register custom message handlers
  registerMessageHandler(handler) {
    if (typeof handler === 'function') {
      this.messageHandlers.push(handler);
    } else {
      console.warn('Message handler must be a function');
    }
  }`
        }
    </Text>
-  </Text>
  );
}
packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/Connect.js (1)

1-52: Simplify component structure by removing redundant Text wrapper

Similar to the other components, there's unnecessary nesting of Text components that should be simplified.

export function Connect ({ title }) {
  return (
-  <Text>
    <Text>
        {
           `  // Method to establish a WebSocket connection
  connect() {
    return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
      this.websocket = new WebSocket(this.url);

      // On successful connection
      this.websocket.onopen = () => {
        console.log(`Connected to ${title} server`);
        resolve();
      };

      // On receiving a message
      this.websocket.onmessage = (event) => {
        console.log('Message received:', event.data);

        this.messageHandlers.forEach(handler => {
          if (typeof handler === 'function') {
            this.handleMessage(event.data, handler);
          }
        });
      };

      // On error first call custom error handlers, then default error behavior
      this.websocket.onerror = (error) => {
        if (this.errorHandlers.length > 0) {
          // Call custom error handlers
          this.errorHandlers.forEach(handler => handler(error));
        } else {
          // Default error behavior
          console.error('WebSocket Error:', error);
        }
        reject(error);
      };

      // On connection close
      this.websocket.onclose = () => {
        console.log(`Disconnected from ${title} server`);
      };
    });
  }`
        }
    </Text>
-  </Text>
  );
}
packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/template/client.js.js (2)

14-14: Consider adding a descriptive function name.

You might consider giving a more descriptive name (e.g., WebSocketClientTemplate) rather than using the default export function directly. This can improve clarity when referencing it elsewhere.

-export default function ({ asyncapi, params }) {
+export default function WebSocketClientTemplate({ asyncapi, params }) {

28-30: Consider a cosmetic line break for readability.

Adding a blank line after declaring the class can make the generated code more readable.

 <Text>
-  {`class ${clientName} {`}
+  {`class ${clientName} {\n`}
 </Text>
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5ab7c53 and b3cce06.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/test/__snapshots__/snapshot.test.js.snap is excluded by !**/*.snap
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/CloseConnection.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/Connect.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/Constructor.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/HandleMessage.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/ModuleExport.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/RegisterErrorHandler.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/RegisterMessageHandler.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/SendEchoMessage.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/template/client.js.js (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Test generator as dependency with Node 18
  • GitHub Check: Test generator as dependency with Node 20
  • GitHub Check: Test NodeJS PR - windows-latest
🔇 Additional comments (8)
packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/ModuleExport.js (1)

1-11: Clean implementation of the ModuleExport component

The component is well-structured and follows React best practices. It has a single responsibility of generating the module export statement and appropriately uses the Text component from the SDK for rendering.

packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/template/client.js.js (7)

3-3: Looks good!

The new FileHeaderInfo import helps ensure that metadata is clearly displayed.


5-12: Solid modular approach.

These newly introduced component imports (e.g., Constructor, Connect, etc.) improve code organization by separating distinct client functionalities into self-contained modules. This enhances readability and maintainability.


27-27: No issues with the <Requires /> usage.

This centralizes needed imports for the generated client.


31-37: Great modularization of client methods.

Switching to individual components (Constructor, Connect, HandleMessage, etc.) fosters better code clarity and reusability.


38-40: Neat final bracket structure.

Closing the class block in its own <Text> node cleanly separates it from the generated methods. No concerns here.

Also applies to: 42-42


43-43: Clean export declaration.

Using the <ModuleExport clientName={clientName} /> component is consistent with the new modular architecture.


44-45: File closure looks good.

No issues with the final </File> and ); statements.

Comment on lines 5 to 14
<Text>
<Text>
{
` // Method to handle message with callback
handleMessage(message, cb) {
if (cb) cb(message);
}`
}
</Text>
</Text>
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Mar 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Remove unnecessary nested Text component

There's an unnecessary nesting of Text components. The outer Text component (line 5) wraps another Text component (line 6) without adding any value.

export function HandleMessage () {
  return (
-  <Text>
    <Text>
        {
          `  // Method to handle message with callback
  handleMessage(message, cb) {
    if (cb) cb(message);
  }`
        }
    </Text>
-  </Text>
  );
}
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
<Text>
<Text>
{
` // Method to handle message with callback
handleMessage(message, cb) {
if (cb) cb(message);
}`
}
</Text>
</Text>
export function HandleMessage () {
return (
<Text>
{
` // Method to handle message with callback
handleMessage(message, cb) {
if (cb) cb(message);
}`
}
</Text>
);
}

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@derberg I add this Text because of extra spacing i.e new line between all the functions of class. But ok maybe I will remove extra from all and rather update snapshots. wdyt?

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if you need new lines, use props available in Text component

Comment on lines +18 to +19
const clientName = getClientName(info);
const serverName = getServerUrl(server);
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Mar 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Validate server existence.

If params.server is unspecified, server may be undefined, leading to potential runtime errors. Ensure that the server key is always provided and valid.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Confirm that 'params.server' is always set in the code/configuration.

rg -A 5 "params\.server"

Length of output: 3364


Action Required: Validate 'params.server' Exists
The current implementation in packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/template/client.js.js retrieves the server using:

const server = asyncapi.servers().get(params.server);

There is no check ensuring that params.server is provided. If it happens to be undefined, this can lead to runtime errors when subsequently calling getServerUrl(server) and elsewhere.

Recommendations:

  • Add a validation check: Before accessing the server, confirm that params.server is defined. For example:
    if (!params.server) {
      throw new Error('The server parameter is required.');
    }
    const server = asyncapi.servers().get(params.server);
  • Review similar usage in other template files: Ensure that any place using params.server (such as in the README template) performs a similar validation.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@derberg I didn't make any changes in this as well originally also no checks where written for params. I am not sure that should we throw Error from a template component? wdyt? We also then need to add same check in README.md.js template.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, extra not related effort, @Adi-204 please create an issue to address it. Without server the template will not work, so we for use need to use hasServers function (if there is such) and if there is non, we need to discuss if we want to throw error or actually suggest a workaround (it is possible to have custom parameters in templates) - anyway, please create an issue

@derberg
Copy link
Member

derberg commented Mar 13, 2025

@Adi-204 you're getting some good pointers from rabbit, please adjust accordingly

@Adi-204
Copy link
Contributor Author

Adi-204 commented Mar 13, 2025

@derberg few questions before commit regarding improvements suggested in Nitpick comments -

  1. The indentation inside your template string is inconsistent with the JSX structure. Consider either using consistent indentation or using a tool like Prettier to maintain code formatting. Again the formatting is not nice because of match with snapshot so I can format and change the snapshot but I think it is fine if we don't. wdyt?

  2. Same question for the suggested improvement Consider a cosmetic line break for readability.

  • {class ${clientName} {}
  • {class ${clientName} {\n}

It don't think this 2 are very important. wdyt?

Copy link
Member

@derberg derberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe this should also be a separate component for clarity:

        <Text>
           {`class ${clientName} {`}
        </Text>
          <Constructor serverName={serverName} />
          <Connect title={title} />
          <RegisterMessageHandler />
          <RegisterErrorHandler />
          <HandleMessage />
          <SendEchoMessage />
          <CloseConnection />
        <Text>
          {
            `}`
          }
        </Text>

and yeah, best if generated code is clean, aligned and readable, so adding new lines makes sense, just not with \n but use props from Text component

all props view <Text indent={size} type={type} newLines={newLines}>

so you're looking for <Text newLines={2}>

@derberg
Copy link
Member

derberg commented Mar 13, 2025

and yes, snapshots can be edited - nothing bad happens because they can be reviewed on the PR level and we can validate if the change is good - this is what they are for

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/ClientClass.js (1)

11-32: Well-structured component implementation

The ClientClass component cleanly encapsulates the JavaScript class generation using a component-based approach. This is a significant improvement over the previous template string-based implementation, making the code more maintainable and modular.

However, there's inconsistent indentation in the template string at lines 25-27 compared to the JSX structure.

            <Text>
-                {
-                    `}`
-                }
+                {`}`}
            </Text>
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 07c27a9 and 34e6eab.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/test/__snapshots__/snapshot.test.js.snap is excluded by !**/*.snap
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/ClientClass.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/CloseConnection.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/Connect.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/Constructor.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/HandleMessage.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/RegisterErrorHandler.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/RegisterMessageHandler.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/SendEchoMessage.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/template/client.js.js (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/Constructor.js
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/Connect.js
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/CloseConnection.js
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/SendEchoMessage.js
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/RegisterErrorHandler.js
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/RegisterMessageHandler.js
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/HandleMessage.js
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Test generator as dependency with Node 20
  • GitHub Check: Test generator as dependency with Node 18
  • GitHub Check: Test NodeJS PR - windows-latest
🔇 Additional comments (5)
packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/ClientClass.js (2)

1-10: Clean import structure

The imports are well-organized, importing the required Text component from the SDK and all the necessary client-related components. This demonstrates good componentization of the previously monolithic client code.


11-32: Verify component composition

The component structure is logical and well-organized. Each method of the original WebSocket client has been properly extracted into its own component, which are now composed together in this parent component.

packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/template/client.js.js (3)

1-5: Clean import structure with new components

The imports have been updated to include the new ClientClass component, while maintaining the existing imports for helper functions and other components.


7-13: Improved variable extraction and clarity

The code now explicitly extracts clientName and serverName using helper functions, which improves readability and makes the dependencies clearer. This is a good practice for maintainability.

Note: There's still an unresolved issue regarding validation of params.server existence, but per the previous review comments, this will be addressed in a separate issue.


20-22: Successful implementation of componentization

The refactoring to use the ClientClass component instead of the inline template string represents a successful implementation of componentization. This change significantly improves code organization and maintainability.

@Adi-204 Adi-204 requested a review from derberg March 13, 2025 13:25
@Adi-204
Copy link
Contributor Author

Adi-204 commented Mar 13, 2025

@derberg I completely forgot about TODO mentioned 😅 should we remove it? And the additional Nitpick comments.

Copy link
Member

@derberg derberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, please remove TODO comment and the nitpick is pretty straighforward so address it too please

@Adi-204 Adi-204 requested a review from derberg March 13, 2025 14:13
@derberg
Copy link
Member

derberg commented Mar 13, 2025

one last thing, I see in few places you do something like below

` constructor()`

adding indent "manually".

please instead do

<Text indent={2}>

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/Connect.js (1)

5-48: Consider maintaining consistent indentation within the template string

While the <Text indent={2}> handles the initial indentation, there's manual indentation within the template string. For consistency, consider using either a consistent indentation approach throughout the template or a tool like Prettier to format the code.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a469c9 and 24a3d0f.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/test/__snapshots__/snapshot.test.js.snap is excluded by !**/*.snap
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/CloseConnection.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/Connect.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/Constructor.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/HandleMessage.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/RegisterErrorHandler.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/RegisterMessageHandler.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/SendEchoMessage.js (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/RegisterErrorHandler.js
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/Constructor.js
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/CloseConnection.js
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/RegisterMessageHandler.js
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/SendEchoMessage.js
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/HandleMessage.js
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: Test generator as dependency with Node 20
  • GitHub Check: Test generator as dependency with Node 18
  • GitHub Check: Test NodeJS PR - windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: Test NodeJS PR - macos-13
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/Connect.js (3)

1-51: Good componentization effort with a clean approach

This component is well-structured and follows a clean approach to generating WebSocket connection code. The use of the Text component with appropriate indentation settings is a good practice, as suggested in the PR comments.


14-14: Template string interpolation issue noted in previous reviews

There was a previous discussion about the template string interpolation here. I note that this was intentionally kept as is with single quotes, as the code is generating a template string that will be interpolated at runtime, not during component rendering.


43-43: Template string interpolation issue noted in previous reviews

Same template string interpolation pattern as line 14, which was previously discussed and intentionally kept as is with single quotes.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/Connect.js (2)

43-43: ⚠️ Potential issue

Template string variable won't be interpolated.

Similar to the previous issue, the single quotes in this console log statement prevent the title variable from being interpolated at runtime.

-      console.log('Disconnected from ${title} server');
+      console.log(`Disconnected from ${title} server`);

14-14: ⚠️ Potential issue

Template string variable won't be interpolated.

The single quotes in the console log statement prevent the title variable from being interpolated at runtime.

-      console.log('Connected to ${title} server');
+      console.log(`Connected to ${title} server`);
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/Connect.js (2)

1-50: The component structure looks good, but consider improving indentation.

The Connect component is well-organized with appropriate separation of WebSocket event handlers. The use of the Text component for code generation is appropriate.

Consider maintaining consistent indentation within the template string to match the JSX structure, making the code more readable. The indent={2} prop properly handles the initial indentation, but the internal indentation could be more consistent.


31-39: Consider adding error type checking for better error handling.

The error handling mechanism works, but you might want to add more specific error type checking for better debugging and user feedback.

    this.websocket.onerror = (error) => {
      if (this.errorHandlers.length > 0) {
        // Call custom error handlers
        this.errorHandlers.forEach(handler => handler(error));
      } else {
        // Default error behavior
-        console.error('WebSocket Error:', error);
+        const errorMessage = error.message || 'Unknown WebSocket error';
+        console.error(`WebSocket Error: ${errorMessage}`);
      }
      reject(error);
    };
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 24a3d0f and 8262e21.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/test/__snapshots__/snapshot.test.js.snap is excluded by !**/*.snap
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/CloseConnection.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/Connect.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/HandleMessage.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/RegisterErrorHandler.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/RegisterMessageHandler.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/SendEchoMessage.js (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/CloseConnection.js
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/HandleMessage.js
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/RegisterMessageHandler.js
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/RegisterErrorHandler.js
  • packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/components/SendEchoMessage.js
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: Test generator as dependency with Node 20
  • GitHub Check: Test generator as dependency with Node 18
  • GitHub Check: Test NodeJS PR - windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: Test NodeJS PR - macos-13

@Adi-204
Copy link
Contributor Author

Adi-204 commented Mar 13, 2025

@derberg thanks for the guidance lot of learning's and I will try to improve quality of PR. Any more changes? Any feedback/suggestion for me?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

continue componentization of existing client: packages/templates/clients/js/websocket/template/client.js.js
2 participants