We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In With-Meta mode, We can use route interface to query table's location as follow:
curl --location --request POST 'http://{CeresMetaAddr}:8080/api/v1/route' \ --header 'Content-Type: application/json' \ --data-raw '{ "clusterName":"defaultCluster", "schemaName":"public", "table":["demo"] }'
But there is no one in No-Meta mode.
Should we support interface route in No-Meta mode?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Duplicate of #146
Sorry, something went wrong.
If #146 fixed, we can retrieve routing information from CeresDB rather than CeresMeta no matter which mode is chosen.
Yes, I think it is more reasonable to retrieve routing information from CeresDB. It is not necessary for users to be aware of Meta.
No branches or pull requests
Describe This Problem
In With-Meta mode, We can use route interface to query table's location as follow:
But there is no one in No-Meta mode.
Proposal
Should we support interface route in No-Meta mode?
Additional Context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: