-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix for adding unexpected Empty Records in Nested Arrays in BigQueryIO #34102
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment R: @robertwb for label java. Available commands:
The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments). |
@ahmedabu98 can you take a look at this? thanks! |
do not merge yet, I think I found another bug. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This LGTM! Thanks for taking this @stankiewicz
Lmk when it's ready to merge
...latform/src/test/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/gcp/bigquery/TableRowToStorageApiProtoTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...latform/src/test/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/gcp/bigquery/TableRowToStorageApiProtoTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
issue I see additional problem here: StorageApiWriteUnshardedRecords If we have a row with known fields (name:string, surname:string) and one unknown (foo:string) , this line will concat and not cause schema issues. but if unknown field is part of repeated structure, For current bug, it is resolved - it won't add empty records so we can merge it. Added issue for concatenating unknown nested fields which may require bigger changes #34145 |
fixes #33842