-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Substantial performance regression on 1.11 relative to 1.10 #542
Comments
is this just running |
Why would testing be different? Also, more than doubling the time it takes to run tests seems ... less than optimal when it comes to development. |
tests are run with stuff like bounds checking forced "on" for everything, it could be some heuristics change from Julia compiler side that accidentally changed compilation result for test-time only
yes assuming there is development... |
Manually running tests outside of 1.10:
Test Summary: | Pass Total Time
ArrowTypes | 127 127 0.5s
Test Summary: | Pass Total Time
Date and time wrappers with missing | 4 4 5.0s
Test Summary: | Pass Total Time
`default(T) isa T` | 10 10 0.0s
Test Summary: | Pass Total Time
Arrow | 66047 66047 3m48.7s
239.948859 seconds (897.30 M allocations: 59.172 GiB, 5.05% gc time, 97.20% compilation time: <1% of which was recompilation) 1.11:
Test Summary: | Pass Total Time
ArrowTypes | 127 127 0.5s
Test Summary: | Pass Total Time
Date and time wrappers with missing | 4 4 5.9s
Test Summary: | Pass Total Time
`default(T) isa T` | 10 10 0.0s
Test Summary: | Pass Total Time
Arrow | 66047 66047 11m50.4s
724.425272 seconds (4.33 G allocations: 196.264 GiB, 2.73% gc time, 99.11% compilation time: <1% of which was recompilation |
that's pretty bad huh |
Casual testing on my M1 Macbook shows a pretty substantial performance regression on tests in 1.11 relative to 1.10.
Julia 1.10:
Julia 1.11:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: