You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The handled denomination is different between regular PFG and PGF over IBC.
So, the denomination of the amount for PGF over IBC is confusing now. Regular PGF uses the default denomination of NAM, however, the one of an IBC transfer is always zero.
The amount in the logs is based on the default denomination on the source Namada.
The logs aren't correct because the funded amounts were 10 NAM (cPGF over IBC) and 5 NAM (rPGF over IBC).
The proposal's amounts were 10 and 5, and they imply zero denomination.
2024-04-15T19:26:58.340854Z INFO namada_apps::node::ledger::shell::governance: Added/Updated ContinousPgf from proposal id 0: set 0.000010 to tnam1q9rhgyv3ydq0zu3whnftvllqnvhvhm270qxay5tn.
2024-04-15T19:26:58.341841Z INFO namada_apps::node::ledger::shell::governance: Execute RetroPgf from proposal id 0: sent 0.000005 to tnam1q9sx4ekzqaq3xdxtruxkm764nhl00cvcsc7df5jf.
We should fix it to use the native token denomination for PGF over IBC too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The handled denomination is different between regular PFG and PGF over IBC.
So, the denomination of the amount for PGF over IBC is confusing now. Regular PGF uses the default denomination of NAM, however, the one of an IBC transfer is always zero.
The amount in the logs is based on the default denomination on the source Namada.
The logs aren't correct because the funded amounts were 10 NAM (cPGF over IBC) and 5 NAM (rPGF over IBC).
The proposal's amounts were 10 and 5, and they imply zero denomination.
We should fix it to use the native token denomination for PGF over IBC too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: