Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Track StandardSyncSummary with breakdown and more granular steps #4342

Closed
Tracked by #8400
ChristopheDuong opened this issue Jun 25, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed
Tracked by #8400
Assignees
Labels
type/enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ChristopheDuong
Copy link
Contributor

ChristopheDuong commented Jun 25, 2021

Tell us about the problem you're trying to solve

StandardSyncSummary is currently tracking sync durations/throughput during "replication" (read source/write destination)

Describe the solution you’d like

We should also have a breakdown of runtime and possibly throughput (amount of data manipulated) by each operations other than source/destination connectors (such as normalization or custom operations).

Status of each steps could also help to differentiate replication failures vs normalization failures

StandardSyncSummary should also “grep” for exceptions and include breakdown between

  • source exit code & exceptions
  • destination exit code & exceptions
  • normalization exit code & exceptions

Describe the alternative you’ve considered or used

A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered or are using today.

@ChristopheDuong ChristopheDuong added the type/enhancement New feature or request label Jun 25, 2021
@ChristopheDuong ChristopheDuong changed the title Track Operation Summary Track StandardSyncSummary with breakdown and more granular steps Dec 7, 2021
@ChristopheDuong ChristopheDuong removed this from the ConnCore Dec 8, 2021 milestone Dec 8, 2021
@cgardens
Copy link
Contributor

@ChristopheDuong does what's defined in the spec mentioned in this issue address what you are getting at here? if so let's close this one as duplicate?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type/enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants