Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Road data conflation pilot project with Grand Co, Moab, and 1Spatial #155

Closed
1 task
gregbunce opened this issue Jun 21, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed
1 task

Road data conflation pilot project with Grand Co, Moab, and 1Spatial #155

gregbunce opened this issue Jun 21, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
@eneemann
Labels
status: blocked This issue or pull request has an unmet prerequisite status: idea This issue is an idea status: waiting Typically waiting on the business owner

Comments

@gregbunce
Copy link

gregbunce commented Jun 21, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Benefit

Data conflation with Grand County will allow us to resolve any differences in the statewide road data and then untimely come away with one, authoritative road data. From there, we can use ArcGIS Portal to collaborate and edit in place on the data. Portal will allow us to use branch versioning and Grand will have their own version.

Acceptance Criteria

  • differences in have been resolved in the datasets (ugrc and county) and we have one dataset moving forward.

Notes

No response

Risks

Issue Reference

refs #
@gregbunce gregbunce converted this from a draft issue Jun 21, 2023
@gregbunce gregbunce changed the title road data conflation pilot with Grand Co, Moab, and 1Spatail Road data conflation pilot project with Grand Co, Moab, and 1Spatail Jun 21, 2023
@nathankota nathankota changed the title Road data conflation pilot project with Grand Co, Moab, and 1Spatail Road data conflation pilot project with Grand Co, Moab, and 1Spatial Jun 27, 2023
@nathankota
Copy link
Contributor

@gregbunce can you define the benefit hypothesis and acceptance criteria when you have a moment? I'm guessing this is a Q2+ "feature", correct?

@gregbunce
Copy link
Author

we can leave this open for now. matt applied for a grant (left over arpa money) and we should hear back in the next few months if we were awarded the funds. if so, we could move this forward.

@gregbunce gregbunce added status: blocked This issue or pull request has an unmet prerequisite status: waiting Typically waiting on the business owner status: idea This issue is an idea labels Sep 25, 2024
@eneemann eneemann assigned eneemann and unassigned gregbunce Jan 8, 2025
@chriswnek
Copy link
Contributor

Confirmed with Laura that there was never any type of grant funding received for this project. Will close.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@eneemann eneemann

Labels
status: blocked This issue or pull request has an unmet prerequisite status: idea This issue is an idea status: waiting Typically waiting on the business owner
Projects
UGRC PI Planning Features
Status: Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@nathankota @gregbunce @eneemann @chriswnek