Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conditionals do not abort lower priority nodes on failure #9

Closed
acdamiani opened this issue Jan 18, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #13
Closed

Conditionals do not abort lower priority nodes on failure #9

acdamiani opened this issue Jan 18, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #13
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@acdamiani
Copy link
Owner

It looks like there is an issue with Conditional aborts as detailed in issue #6. It looks like a logical error in the ExecutableNode.RunDynamicConditionals method. It might be helpful to refactor the boolean logic here, since it's pretty messy and difficult to parse.

@acdamiani acdamiani added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 18, 2024
@ijisthee
Copy link

I can confirm that it works perfectly now. Thank you very much for the fast help. :)

I now can abort the Wander node when the player is in range.

Here is my code. Maybe you or someone else can use it in the future:

using System.Text;
using System.Text.RegularExpressions;
using UnityEngine;

namespace Schema.Builtin.Conditionals
{
    [DarkIcon("Conditionals/d_Compare")]
    [LightIcon("Conditionals/Compare")]
    public class CompareDistance : Conditional
    {
        public enum ComparisonType
        {
            Equal,
            GreaterThan,
            GreaterThanOrEqual,
            LessThan,
            LessThanOrEqual
        }

        [Tooltip("LHS Vector 1 for the Distance check")] public BlackboardEntrySelector<Vector3> firstVector;
        [Tooltip("LHS Vector 2 for the distance check")] public BlackboardEntrySelector<Vector3> secondVector;
        [Tooltip("RHS of the comparison")] public BlackboardEntrySelector<float> distanceToCheck;

        [Tooltip("The comparison type for this operation")]
        public ComparisonType comparisonType;

        public override bool Evaluate(object decoratorMemory, SchemaAgent agent)
        {
            float distance = Vector3.Distance(firstVector.value, secondVector.value);

            switch (comparisonType)
            {
                case ComparisonType.Equal:
                    return distance == distanceToCheck.value;
                case ComparisonType.GreaterThan:
                    return distance > distanceToCheck.value;
                case ComparisonType.GreaterThanOrEqual:
                    return distance >= distanceToCheck.value;
                case ComparisonType.LessThan:
                    return distance < distanceToCheck.value;
                case ComparisonType.LessThanOrEqual:
                    return distance <= distanceToCheck.value;
            }

            return false;
        }

        public override GUIContent GetConditionalContent()
        {
            StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();

            sb.AppendFormat("If distance (<color=red>{0},{1}</color>) is ", firstVector.name, secondVector.name);

            string cName = Regex.Replace(comparisonType.ToString(), "(\\B[A-Z])", " $1").ToLower();

            switch (comparisonType)
            {
                case ComparisonType.Equal:
                case ComparisonType.LessThanOrEqual:
                case ComparisonType.GreaterThanOrEqual:
                    sb.AppendFormat("{0} to ", cName);
                    break;
                case ComparisonType.GreaterThan:
                case ComparisonType.LessThan:
                    sb.AppendFormat("{0} ", cName);
                    break;
            }

            sb.AppendFormat("<color=red>{0}</color>", distanceToCheck.name);

            return new GUIContent(sb.ToString());
        }
    }
}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants