Replies: 1 comment
-
Here's a video that provides more information based on LP participation in different pools: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
We propose enhancing the AMM fee system to give liquidity providers (LPs) more control over how liquidity is used in pools. Currently, the top 8 LPs vote on a single fee capped at 1%. Our idea is to let LPs codify their preferred liquidity dynamics by setting operation-specific fees that impact the pool’s exchange rate. LPs should be given greater power to decide how the liquidity they provide is to be used by adjusting the fees for single sided deposits/withdrawals and swaps to incentivise the flow of XRP into and out of the pool as they choose.
Raise the Fee Cap to 2.5%
Increasing the cap from 1% to 2.5% gives LPs room to experiment with fee structures that reflect their strategies, making pools more adaptable to market conditions.
Operation-Specific Fees for Single-Sided Actions
LPs could vote to set distinct fees for single-sided operations and swaps to steer liquidity usage.
Examples:
XRP deposits or swaps into the pool: Low fees (e.g., 0.1%) to boost XRP liquidity and adjust the exchange rate favourably for the paired token. Issuers and holder of the paired token should have the option to vote to reduce the fees of XRP entering the pool
XRP withdrawals: Higher fees (e.g., 1.5%) to deter XRP exits and stabilise the exchange rate offered by the pool. LP providers should have the option to disincentivise operations that deplete the XRP held in the pool.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions