Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why word embeddings learned from word2vec are linearly correlated #3

Open
zyxue opened this issue Mar 27, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Why word embeddings learned from word2vec are linearly correlated #3

zyxue opened this issue Mar 27, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@zyxue
Copy link

zyxue commented Mar 27, 2018

Hi @WesleyyC , I conducted some experiments myself, and see some funny result as described here,

https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/337083/why-word-embeddings-learned-from-word2vec-are-linearly-correlated

I wonder if you have experienced similar results or have any comment in general?

@WesleyyC
Copy link
Owner

I don't really have a good explanation, but have your tried different randomization method for your initialization?

Essentially the first position and the second position are encoding the same information (since points are linearly correlated). Therefore, the problem comes down to why the embedding just use one single position when it has two position. I suspect that's because in both cases they are genearting really bad result and the two position is initialized in a similar way (let's say all small values around 0) then the gradient might not help to differentiate the two positions.

In addition, to my knowledge, no one has tried to investigate how wod2vec works using highly compressed feature vector, so that might be something interesting to look at.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants