You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
>> Fading correction according to Huntley & Lamothe (2001)
>> g-value re-calculated for the given tc
.. used g-value: 5.312 ± NA %/decade
.. used tc: 8.214e-05 ka
.. used kappa: 0.0231 ± NA
----------------------------------------------
seed: 1
n.MC: 10
observations: 0
----------------------------------------------
Age (faded): 0.1 ka ± NA ka
Age (corr.): 0.1169 ka ± NA ka
----------------------------------------------
[RLum.Results-class]
originator: calc_FadingCorr()
data: 2
.. $age.corr : data.frame
.. $age.corr.MC : numeric
additional info elements: 1
Warning messages:
1: In rnorm(n.MC.i, mean = g_value[1], sd = g_value[2]) : NAs produced
2: In rnorm(n.MC.i, mean = age.faded[1], sd = age.faded[2]) : NAs produced
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If tc or tc.g_value is given a negative input, the following unhelpful message is given:
calc_FadingCorr(age.faded = c(1, 0), g_value = c(5, 1), tc = -2592000)
# [calc_FadingCorr()] Error: No solution found, NULL returned: this usually happens for very large,
# unrealistic g-values, please consider another model for the fading correction
The
age.faded
andg_value
parameters are expected to be of length 2, but this is not enforced. This leads to warnings andNA
s in the results:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: