You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We are opening this issue for public discussion on when it is allowed to re-run a DICE, and how.
The two reasons for doing that are:
to extend the Interpolation Family to Higher/Lower vehicles, and
to correct WLTP data (corrupted or mistaken) or NEDC's CO2 declared-values.
(please reply below if you see is another reason)
In general we suggest to avoid re-dicing, because on every dice,
the sampling decision must be respected (possibly re-testing the vehicle in WLTP/NEDC),
and consequently, the verification-factors must be updated.
So far CLIMA has approved a single re-certification, based on reason no-1.
That was a clear case involving a new physical WLTP test.
For that, JRC implemented the --recertify feature of CO2MPAS in v1.7.3post0,
which preserves the link between both runs, but only the last one is considered "ofrficial".
Of course, re-dicing after the vehicle has been put in circulation would complicate things.
We have also forward requests regarding no-2 to CLIMA
(errors in the inputs, with or without performing new physical WLTP-tests),
and we will explain here the general outcome (criteria, rules applied).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As a general note, there is no universal answer for re-dicing,
every case is different.
In order to understand every such case we need
the following information:
Which is the Interpolation Family ID involved;
What was the CO2MPAS deviation and the random number from the DICE?
Did the vehicle actually undergo a physical NEDC test?
Do you still have the vehicle available?
What was the "problem" requiring a fix?
Would a possible fix affect the CO2MPAS deviation? (Up or down??)
What do you want to change?
the declared values?
wltp series?
road-loads?
something else?
You should be aware that a possible fix still needs to be DICEd.
So in principle, the vehicle has to be available for a physical test before re-dicing.
And since it is CLIMA that decides, we suggest to always send an e-mail to CLIMA
with the above questions answered, and JRC in CC.
We are opening this issue for public discussion on when it is allowed to re-run a DICE, and how.
The two reasons for doing that are:
(please reply below if you see is another reason)
In general we suggest to avoid re-dicing, because on every dice,
the sampling decision must be respected (possibly re-testing the vehicle in WLTP/NEDC),
and consequently, the verification-factors must be updated.
So far CLIMA has approved a single re-certification, based on reason no-1.
That was a clear case involving a new physical WLTP test.
For that, JRC implemented the
--recertify
feature of CO2MPAS inv1.7.3post0
,which preserves the link between both runs, but only the last one is considered "ofrficial".
Of course, re-dicing after the vehicle has been put in circulation would complicate things.
We have also forward requests regarding no-2 to CLIMA
(errors in the inputs, with or without performing new physical WLTP-tests),
and we will explain here the general outcome (criteria, rules applied).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: