Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dual-license: check comply #351

Closed
nsavageJVM opened this issue Aug 25, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Dual-license: check comply #351

nsavageJVM opened this issue Aug 25, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@nsavageJVM
Copy link

Hi I am using this code as a module in the source in another opensource project here
I display the license in the module and make the source available as well as point to this repo in the readme
If any issues exist you can let me know here and I will comply. Thanks for this.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 18, 2016

You are using RichTextFX only as dependency, so why are you commited it's whole source code to your repo, instead of just adding

dependencies {
    compile group: 'org.fxmisc.richtext', name: 'richtextfx', version: '0.7-M2'
}

to gradle.build file? 😕

@nsavageJVM
Copy link
Author

Hi, I made some small changes to the source, I cant remember exactly now as its been a while since I have looked at the code

@TomasMikula
Copy link
Member

TomasMikula commented Dec 24, 2016

Hi. Yeah, that's fine. Dual-licensed means you can pick the license that better suits your needs.

Aside, though, maintaining your own fork might come at a maintenance cost.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants