We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In Hyperplonk, after running the sumchecks, the prover needs to generate a batch opening proof for the polynomial evaluations. In the current implementation: https://github.com/EspressoSystems/hyperplonk/blob/main/hyperplonk/src/snark.rs#L610 https://github.com/EspressoSystems/hyperplonk/blob/main/subroutines/src/pcs/multilinear_kzg/batching.rs#L209 the Fiat-Shamir transcript (for generating the random challenge t) doesn't include the evaluation claims (i.e., the evaluation points and the evaluation values). This would be insecure, as an attacker can adaptively choose the evaluation values after knowing the challenge t.
Action items:
cc @alxiong @mrain @zhenfeizhang
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
In Hyperplonk, after running the sumchecks, the prover needs to generate a batch opening proof for the polynomial evaluations. In the current implementation:
https://github.com/EspressoSystems/hyperplonk/blob/main/hyperplonk/src/snark.rs#L610
https://github.com/EspressoSystems/hyperplonk/blob/main/subroutines/src/pcs/multilinear_kzg/batching.rs#L209
the Fiat-Shamir transcript (for generating the random challenge t) doesn't include the evaluation claims (i.e., the evaluation points and the evaluation values). This would be insecure, as an attacker can adaptively choose the evaluation values after knowing the challenge t.
Action items:
cc @alxiong @mrain @zhenfeizhang
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: