Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
When does your team plan to release this version? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
So FWIW, in the defense space I don't see anything less than 17 in use except in contracts for legacy programs, but those developers already know they're tied for life to lesser versions. I would say baselining to Java 17 would be the safe default for now, and then we should probably rethink our support cadence. Java versions are released ALOT more frequently than they used to be. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
In the next ESAPI release (tentatively, 2.7.0.0) , the ESAPI team is considering making Java 11 the minimal required JDK to use new versions of ESAPI. Java 8, which is currently the minimally supported JDK for ESAPI, is past EOL for the free support. (So is Java 11 for that matter, so perhaps we should just jump straight to Java 17?)
Anyhow, I'd like to here the ESAPI communities thoughts on this. The reason I'd like to move to at least Java 11, is during the past 3 to 6 months, I have seen many Java libraries decide to move to Java 11 or later (probably related to Apache Tomcat and Spring Framework and Spring Boot) and I don't want to put ESAPI in the position where someone EOLs a direct or transitive library dependency that ESAPI is dependent on. I'd like to get a bit ahead of the oncoming storm.
Thoughts?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions