-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update ArchitectureTypeEnum in Linux Package Object #49
Comments
@ikiril01, are you proposing the combination of the I would imagine the enumeration including terms like this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Linux_supported_architectures |
Maybe better ideas for the enumeration: Running
|
Good question @bworrell ! I'm actually no longer quite sure of this one -
|
… ArchitectureType and ArchitectureTypeEnum. Resolves #49
This issue is now open to community feedback. Please see the associated proposal: https://github.com/CybOXProject/schemas/wiki/Proposal:-Change-LinuxPackageObjectType-Architecture-Field-To-ControlledVocabularyStringType |
… ArchitectureType and ArchitectureTypeEnum. Resolves #49
…emoved ArchitectureType and ArchitectureTypeEnum. Resolves #49
Closed by #204 |
Linux_Package_Object has a fairly limited ArchitectureTypeEnum, distinct from CodeObj:ProcessorTypeEnum. While these clearly serve separate purposes, having them in different XSD files will make it harder to ensure that they are up-to-date. Speaking of which, ArchitectureTypeEnum could do with i586, i686, x64_64, and armel - all architectures used in Linux packages. There may even be alpha and m68k boxes still out there.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: