You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Does it make sense to have a SelfSupervisedSolver class that wraps all cases?
As far as I can see, we could add Noise2Inverse, equivariat imaging, SURE in a loss class that just takes loss(noisy,model) , each with their own parameters to set (e.g. splits, rotations, etc)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Does it make sense to have a SelfSupervisedSolver class that wraps all cases?
As far as I can see, we could add Noise2Inverse, equivariat imaging, SURE in a loss class that just takes
loss(noisy,model)
, each with their own parameters to set (e.g. splits, rotations, etc)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: