You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Buggy needs a way of declaring function objects to pass functions around. This would greatly improve the way a group implementation is presented. Currently it is not possible to see what happens in e.g. a map function. It simply looks like this.
Where Map:ArrayStreamOut would flow into the function and Map:ResultStreamIn is the resulting value of the function call.
I think the most promising way would be to process those function objects in the postprocessing stage and insert the function in the specified places.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Buggy needs a way of declaring function objects to pass functions around. This would greatly improve the way a group implementation is presented. Currently it is not possible to see what happens in e.g. a map function. It simply looks like this.
Where
Map:ArrayStreamOut
would flow into the function andMap:ResultStreamIn
is the resulting value of the function call.I think the most promising way would be to process those function objects in the postprocessing stage and insert the function in the specified places.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: